Admitting a Weakness as a Weapon: The Strongest Move That Looks Like a Mistake
I told the other side our claim carried a real risk of failing. Out loud, on the record. From that sentence on, they weighed every further word of mine differently — which was exactly what I needed.
Litigation as an Investment: When to Stop Suing Even Though You Are Right
Being right at a cost of hundreds of thousands and three years of your life is a worse business than it looks. How to run the numbers on a dispute as an investment — with an outcome tree, full costs and a break-even point for settling.
The clock runs in every dispute — but at a different speed for each side. Work out whose asset is decaying and you know when to run and when to sit still.
The Other Side Without a Mandate: The Most Expensive Chair at the Table Is the Empty One
Ninety minutes of negotiation, the other side nodding along — and then comes \"I'll have to run this past…\". At that moment you discover you have shown your cards, for free, to someone who cannot sign anything.
It Is Being Recorded: Sentences to Never Say at the Negotiating Table
Czech law knows no settlement privilege. What you say in settlement talks may one day be read by a judge. A guide to what your sentences will turn into two years later, in a courtroom.
Anatomy of a Scam: How I Bought Four Figurines and One Very Expensive Lesson
A lawyer wired money up front to a stranger and got half the goods. Here is what I did next, minute by minute — and why the money came back, which almost never happens to victims of marketplace fraud.
Chess, Poker, Monopoly — and Snakes and Ladders: Four Games You Play in Court Without Knowing It
Law looks like a system of rules. It runs more like four different games at once — one with full information, one with hidden information, one fought over resources, and one decided by a roll of the dice. A dense popular-science look at what game theory, behavioural economics and the sociology of law say about positions, bluffs, capital accumulation and faith in „justice" — from Kotov and von Neumann through Kahneman and Galanter to Schelling.
The Lawyer as Illusionist: Magic, Therapy, or PR — What the Client Actually Needs
Clients come to a lawyer with problems the law cannot answer. Instead of a therapist, a mediation worker, a crisis-PR specialist, or a conflict coach, they hire a lawyer — and the lawyer tries to perform magic. A dense popular-science look at what therapeutic jurisprudence, Edgar Schein, Russell Ackoff, and modern crisis communication say about this borderline role.
The Psychology of the Parties: How a Judge Decides, What Each Side Wants, Doesn't Know It Wants, and Says It Wants
The court is not a justice machine, the client doesn't really know their own interests, and the other side is lying most to themselves. A dense popular-science look at what current research says about the psychology of everyone in a legal dispute — from Danziger through Burton and Argyris to Stone, Patton & Heen.
You Don't Negotiate with Terrorists: The Irrational Adversary Is Vermin
Classical game theory assumes a rational actor. But what if the person on the other side wants not to win, but to destroy you — even at the cost of their own ruin? A dense popular-science look at what game theory, evolutionary biology and clinical psychology say about the irrational adversary — and which strategies remain when Harvard isn't enough.
Statutes Are Just the Foundation: Psychology and Tactics in a Legal Dispute
Why the best lawyers don't read only the statute book — a popular-science look at what behavioural economics and the Harvard Negotiation School tell us about negotiation, cognitive biases, and the psychology of disputes.