Admitting a Weakness as a Weapon: The Strongest Move That Looks Like a Mistake
I told the other side our claim carried a real risk of partly failing in court. Out loud, on the record. From that sentence on, they weighed every further word of mine differently — which was exactly what I needed.
Litigation as an Investment: When to Stop Suing Even Though You Are Right
Being right at a cost of hundreds of thousands and three years of your life is a worse business than it looks. How to run the numbers on a dispute as an investment — with an outcome tree, full costs and a break-even point for settling.
The clock runs in every dispute — but at a different speed for each side. Work out whose asset is decaying and you know when to run and when to sit still.
The Other Side Without a Mandate: The Most Expensive Chair at the Table Is the Empty One
Ninety minutes of negotiation, the other side nodding along — and then comes \"I'll have to run this past…\". At that moment you discover you have shown your cards, for free, to someone who cannot sign anything.
It Is Being Recorded: Sentences to Never Say at the Negotiating Table
Czech law knows no settlement privilege. What you say in settlement talks may one day be read by a judge. A guide to what your sentences will turn into two years later, in a courtroom.
Anatomy of a Scam: How I Bought Four Figurines and a Lesson I Won't Forget
A lawyer wired money up front to a stranger and got only part of the goods. Here is what I did next, minute by minute — and why the money came back, which almost never happens to victims of marketplace fraud.
Chess, Poker, Monopoly — and Snakes and Ladders: Four Games You Play in Court Without Knowing It
Law presents itself as a system of rules. Yet a dispute is often played as one of four games: with full information, with hidden cards, over resources, or with nothing but the hope of rolling a six. What game theory, behavioural economics and the sociology of law say about position, bluffing, staying power and faith in justice, from Kotov and von Neumann through Kahneman and Galanter to Schelling.
The Psychology of the Parties: How a Judge Decides and What a Client Wants but Won't Say
Judges are prone to the same biases as everyone else, clients often want something other than what they say, and both the other side and the lawyer have blind spots of their own. What the research shows, where it is disputed, and what it means for running a case.
You Don't Negotiate with Terrorists: The Irrational Adversary Is Vermin
Classical game theory assumes a rational opponent. But what if the person on the other side is not out to win, but to destroy you, even if it ruins them too? What game theory, behavioural economics and psychology say about such an opponent, and which strategies are left when the Harvard school of negotiation falls short.
Statutes Are Just the Foundation: Psychology and Tactics in a Legal Dispute
Why good lawyers read more than the statute book. A popular-science overview of what behavioural economics and the Harvard school of negotiation say about bargaining, cognitive biases and the psychology of disputes.
What You Didn't Know You Could Ask For in a Civil Lawsuit
Case law from the past two years shows that a party to civil proceedings can demand far more from the court than the textbook suggests. Seven procedural tools that decide cases which only look straightforward.
Criminal Complaint: What Happens When Someone Files One Against You
Someone has filed a criminal complaint against you. What happens now, how providing an explanation differs from being questioned as an accused person, what rights you have and what to avoid. Calmly and to the point.